What BEPS addresses
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting refers to international tax planning strategies that exploit gaps between different countries' tax rules to artificially shift profits to low or no-tax jurisdictions, away from where the real economic activity actually happens. The global BEPS initiative introduced coordinated measures — many of which India has adopted — to counter this.
What GAAR does domestically
India's General Anti-Avoidance Rules give tax authorities the power to disregard an arrangement, or recharacterise it, if its main purpose is to obtain a tax benefit and it lacks genuine commercial substance — essentially, a backstop against structures designed primarily for tax avoidance rather than genuine business reasons.
What this means for a business with cross-border structures
- Intercompany arrangements need genuine commercial rationale, not just tax efficiency, to withstand scrutiny
- Substance matters — where key decisions are actually made, where employees with real authority are located, and where genuine business risk is borne all factor into whether a structure holds up
- Documentation of the commercial reasons behind a structure — not just its tax outcome — is important to maintain contemporaneously
What tends to attract scrutiny
- Structures where the tax benefit is disproportionate to any discernible commercial purpose
- Entities with minimal genuine substance (no real staff, decision-making, or operations) holding significant assets or income
- Round-trip or circular arrangements that don't reflect genuine independent business activity
A practical takeaway
Any cross-border structure should be able to answer a straightforward question convincingly: what is the genuine commercial reason for this structure, independent of the tax outcome? If that answer isn't clear and well-documented, the structure carries real risk under both BEPS-aligned rules and GAAR.
Related Reading
Have a question about your specific situation?
Talk to Our Team →